Walsh Bay
Walsh Bay, with its finger wharves and warehouses, has been the subject of
intense and prolonged speculation on its future shape and use. One of the
largest developments of a heritage site in Sydney, the $650m Walsh Bay
project in its final form is intended by the State Government to be a
cultural and recreational hub for the city.

|
Above: A new scheme will see Walsh Bay, on the western side of the Harbour Bridge, become a dynamic new cultural and recreational centre for Sydney. Photograph by Leanne Gould
Above: Interior of one of the finger wharves at Walsh Bay, which were built early this century for the movement and storage of goods. Photograph by Leanne Gould |
When the wharves at Walsh Bay were constructed, they were an innovative
response to the storage and unloading needs of the busy port of Sydney.
They were built by the Sydney Harbour Trust as part of its large scale
urban and port renewal plan to combat the plague outbreak at the turn of
the century.
Today the disused wharves and the streets around them are a somewhat
forlorn reminder of the days when Sydney Harbour was a busy working port.
But in a major commitment by the State Government and the private sector,
the wharves at Hickson Road and the surrounding precinct known as Walsh Bay
are to be reborn. After a world wide re-development tender process the
Heritage Council has approved a plan which will see Walsh Bay become one of
Sydney's most dynamic cultural and recreational precincts, coupled with a
major new residential and commercial development.
The main features of the plan are:
- conservation and development of wharves 2 & 3 as a cultural centre;
- a 1 000 seat theatre on the site of the Bond Stores in Hickson Road;
- upgrading of wharves 4 & 5 and retention of their current use for cultural
activities;
- the creation of a public promenade along the water's edge;
- construction of a residential building on the area currently occupied by
wharves 6 & 7;
- adaptive reuse of wharves 8 & 9 for a hotel, with finishes in keeping with
the overall significance of the area.
The Government's original call document sought to retain the heritage
characteristics of the precinct in any development of the Walsh Bay site.
However, the discovery of much greater termite infestation than anticipated
in the wharves and shore sheds required at least a $50 million injection of
cash to save the wharves. The successful tenderer, Walsh Bay Properties,
indicated to the Government that for the project to go ahead and be
financially viable, at least two wharves would require demolition. This was
unacceptable to the Government, and together with the unforeseen cost, the
fate of the wharves - and the entire project - was at an impasse.
The Government invited Phillipe Robert, a renowned French architect with
particular expertise in the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage sites, to
review the project. Under Robert's concept wharves 2 & 3, 4 & 5 and 8 & 9
will be retained. Wharves 6 & 7 and elements of the shore sheds (with the
exception of the Hickson Road facade) will be replaced with a residential
building to contain 400 units and underground parking. The space left
vacant by the demolished shore sheds will be filled with a 500 metre long
public promenade.
The plan has not been without its critics. However, key defenders of
heritage have come to support the final version of the Government's vision
for Walsh Bay. Notable among these is the Heritage Council, which had
initially expressed reservations about the demolition of any of the Hickson
Road wharves. However, as Howard Tanner, Deputy Chair of the Council put
it; 'A great deal of time has been spent looking at every possible option
to save all the wharves, and in an ideal world we would wish that to
happen. The reality is, however, that the overall plan would not be
financially viable and could not go ahead without some replacement of the
wharf structures'.
'I believe the plan in its final form delivers a fantastic new cultural
heartland to the people of Sydney and opens up precious waterfront land to
the public in a way which has not been possible before.'
'Breathing new life into the past, in the end, is what heritage should be
about'.